Sunday, September 29

interview: millie lovelock (astro children; trick mammoth)

Photo by Tannia Lee (from here)
On the back of my previous post promoting my new feature, here is the full[ish] interview I did with Millie Lovelock, a local Dunedin musician and student:

What was your first encounter with sexism as a musician? When I first started playing music in high school males (who were usually younger than me) would always ask me if I needed help plugging in my guitar but would never say the same thing to other males. But I didn’t play music very often at school - it was mostly at university when it started to become more apparent to me that being a girl and playing music was weird. No one who I have worked with personally has been sexist towards me, it’s usually people who I don’t know at all - people who see us play then come talk to me afterwards.

Isaac [the other half of Millie's band Astro Children] and I were playing a house party for someone’s birthday. It was a pretty basic setup - we didn’t have a microphone or anything, we’d been improvising for a while - just jamming and people were enjoying it I assume, they were watching us and then this guy just yelled out, “Show us your pink bits.” The whole room booed him and I yelled at him to stop being a misogynist piece of shit so I think he left after that. That was shocking because we’d been playing and people had been enjoying watching us and being respectable and this guy thought it was okay to yell that - he would have never yelled that at any other person playing. He thought "oh because you’re a girl and people are enjoying the music I better say something obnoxious now."

Have you ever questioned why there aren’t many female musicians on the main Dunedin gig circuit?

I know that the mainstream music media dictates that rock bands are for male musicians and folk bands are for female musicians - or females can be sexy pop singers. I think it’s harder to break into it if you don’t think you can be a part of that group.

How did you break that mold?

Astro Children didn’t used to sound like we sound now but then our bass player left. Then we played one gig - it was a pint night or something. I borrowed all of my friend’s pedals as a kind of experiment and a friend heard us and asked us to play a few other things. It was just a fluke. We were really, really loud that one time then we had to sustain that but I really enjoy it.

Do you feel like when you perform, especially like that, there’s an element of feminist activism coming through?
I’m not sure. I’m definitely trying to be feminine but I’m also trying to be kind of terrifying, which is something I do to prove myself. I think "Okay, I’m small and I am female but I’m fierce so don’t mess with me." I once had someone come up to me in Christchurch and tell me that I was the scariest thing he'd ever seen when I performed. In a male dominated music scene I am definitely advocating the idea that I can be just as tough as you are, just as loud and aggressive and I don’t have to be a folk singer.

Are males ever weird around you after they see you perform?

Sometimes. One time I had a guy tell me that I was wasting Isaac’s talent by being in a band with him because I had a nice singing voice and so I should go off and sing nice songs and Isaac should be in a rock band. He thought he was being helpful I think - he genuinely believed he had good advice to give me.

Do you think he saw what you were doing as a challenge to what he was used to?

Potentially. It was in Oamaru so he may not have experienced anything like our band’s music before.

Yeah there’s definitely a conservative understanding of music - especially in smaller towns where some people still hold onto the traditional idea of what a rock band is. Even alternative rock as a genre could be seen weirdly...If you were to have a career as a full-time musician, what would you do to mitigate the compromising of your morals? Or limiting the amount of sexualisation...?

I know that being on independent labels you have almost complete control of everything you do so if I was going to do music for the rest of my life I’d probably try to stay on independent labels. Having a manager seems like a dangerous root to go down, but I’m not sure exactly. I’d rather just be completely in control of what we produce and how we sell it. But the way music is sold is incredibly male-dominated and there’s no strong feminine culture in music as a whole, especially in New Zealand. There’s very much like an all boys club going on.

And that mentality gets passed on.

It’s inherent in the small things - l notice it, for example, when I get introduced to someone. It’s not so much with Astro Children because there’s only two of us but when I’m with Trick Mammoth and we get introduced to usually an older male he’ll shake the male band members’ hands  but then he won’t want to shake my hand or he won’t even think of doing it. They don’t register that it’s weird not to shake my hand and have a strange look when I put out my hand. They’re not doing it on purpose, it’s just ingrained in their minds that either I’m not in the band or  I’m someone’s girlfriend or you just don’t shake a girl’s hand or whatever.

Do you see anything or any person turning around these sexist issues?

As a teenage girl I was under the impression that I couldn’t be a successful musician because I wasn’t a guy. I think if Grimes or Lorde had been around when I was 15 or 16 years old then that would have helped me - it also would have helped a lot of people who I was friends with as well. The more female role models there are the better it will get because young women will start to envision a market for them. Grimes doesn’t have an exclusively female fan base and she takes herself seriously and she takes what she does seriously - she’s prepared to tell people not to treat her differently. The longer that kind of message is ingrained into people’s heads the more likely males will come to question sexism in the industry.

Sexism feels insurmountable. You can’t even walk down the street without being yelled at. If you can’t be taken seriously in your day to day life then you’re not going to be taken seriously when you’re doing something else like music.

As a musician you always want to be about your music, but if you continue your career as a musician you’re always going to be asked about what it’s like to be a female musician. But male musicians will never be asked that.

No matter who is talking about you if you’re a female and making music they’ll always say this person who is a girl is making this music. It has to be emphasised, “Oh by the way, this person has a vagina.”

I think what’s also so dangerous about sexism is that women have had it ingrained in them just as much as men have. This makes it that much harder to get out of that situation. If you’re a woman and you can’t take yourself seriously because you can’t take women seriously then it’s a never ending cycle of oppression.
   

Friday, September 27

white fungus update

White Fungus at Kadist Art Foundation in San Francisco
Samin Son White Fungus 13 Parade Dairy Island Bay
Today Zane and I interviewed the editor of the fantastic, counter culture magazine called ‘White Fungus’. The editor, Ron Hanson, is based in Taiwan (where he was when we interviewed him) but grew up in New Zealand. The interview will be up on this blog soon. When I meet this kind of person I freak out a bit and can't quite believe such cool people exist. Still buzzin'.

xx
Lou

Saturday, September 21

this trivial world

Picture from here.

Breaking news in the world of conspiracies: The Economist may have copied my Critic feature headline! (Although this is probably not true as the world is a mysterious place). The title of the Economist article which came out today reads: The Emperor's New Pictures. The title of my article which came out a week ago read: The Emperor's New Art. The Economist category title reads: In Praise of Art Forgery...guess it's not the only kind of forgery that's going on... The only other explanation for all this is the cloud of shared consciousness theory. You choose!

xx
Lou

Wednesday, September 18

interview: patrick lundberg (artist)

No title, 2012, gesso, acrylic and varnish on pins, 13 parts, dimensions variable (each ball 15mm diameter)


Zane recently interviewed New Zealand artist Patrick Lundberg for an article in Critic Magazine. Before the interview, Lundberg was named the University of Otago’s Frances Hodgkins Fellow for 2014. He will receive the equivalent of a lecturer’s salary for the year and a space on campus to pursue his work. Below is the transcript of Zane's interview with Lundberg.


How do you feel about receiving this Fellowship? 

Quite overwhelmed, really. It’s obviously very prestigious and I’m very grateful to receive it and have the time that it affords me to make art next year. And also the opportunity to live somewhere else for a year is very nice.

You have previously expressed surprise at being the recipient – is this not something you apply for?

Yeah, I did apply for it but I assumed that a lot of people were applying so there’s still an element of surprise in being told that you’ve received it. Also, there was a long period of time between applying and hearing.

Obviously you now join ranks with New Zealand artists as varied and established as Ralph Hotere, Rohan Wealleans and Kushana Bush, to name a few. Do you perhaps see this as symbolic of your art truly finding its stride in New Zealand?

I don’t know what it means, really. So no, I couldn’t say that definitively.

Do you hope for your work to change in any way over the next year? Do you have a direction you envisage pursuing?

With the Fellowship I will be planning to follow on with a strand of work that I’ve been pursuing over the past few years, but I do hope that given the amount of time that’s afforded for me to work in the studio, the work will change in unforeseen ways.

The last time that I was afforded a bit more time to pursue my practice, I noticed that kind of [unforeseen change] occurring more often, and in a bit more of a noticeable way than when I’m working and pursuing art at the same time. With extra time and space I get to attend to it a little bit more and force things through and try new things.

You talk of your recent work as games – how are they games and how do they work?

They’re not quite games – they’re like games and instruments in that they’re a set of things to be performed in some way, and that is what distinguishes them from other kinds of painting; they have the potential to implicate the viewer much more actively and I like to think that the viewer can play the painting, so to speak, or perform it as you do an instrument or a game. But they don’t have the rules of a game and nor do they have the depth or history of an established form of musical instrument. The boundaries are very different; they’re sort of being worked out as I make them.

And who are your influences? For example, it could be said that your work relates to Killeen whereby collectors and gallerists become curators of each piece…

Yeah, Killeen is definitely a legitimate interest. I’m also very interested in someone like Fred Sandback, although I have a slightly different relationship to him because his sculptures exist with a given set of instructions to be performed by an institution. In relationship to a site there’s some level of contingency in those sculptures, but I think I’m interested in intensifying the level of contingency in the work and changing that relationship between the work and its iteration by another agent, be that an institution or an individual. So the things that I make, rather than existing as an instruction or a [musical] score, they exist as a set of physical parameters that you can play with. More like the Killeens, but I’m interested in that history throughout American modernism, Sol LeWitt and people like that as well, where the works are sort of instructional.

Yeah, and the pinheads themselves that you use - are they relatively standard gallery pins? 

Oh no, they’re much larger! They’re a big wooden ball – the diameter is about 15mm so they have more of a presence on the wall. I’ve also started to sculpt things that sort of sit on those pinheads too.

I was meaning to ask about that! Will you continue to expand the overall shapes of pins, as you did recently at Ivan Anthony Gallery?

Yeah, definitely, and I’m interested in working between the wall and the floor also. I’ve been working on some stuff that plays with that relationship a bit at the moment.

Well, I remember seeing your suspended wooden pictographs at Wellington’s City Gallery a few years back and it was quite intriguing – is there a reason you have gone away from this area of work?

I am still making that sort of work; it’s just that what I’m presenting is a different strain at the moment. There is still that sort of stuff going on in the background in my studio but I just found that there’s plenty of work started on a whim and if it feels good in relation to everything else you’re doing, then it becomes a little bit more consuming. [The pins have] become very intellectually engaging for me, and that’s why – publicly, at least – I’ve been following that strain of work a bit more evidently than other things. Also, I felt like I had shown that sort of work for a little while and if there was something else going on in the studio it was good to give that an airing.

And does the same go for the hanging painted laces?

Yeah, but with them I reached what I felt to be some sort of limit. I don’t think it’s a necessary limit but it’s one that I haven’t been able to overcome, where I tried to make them more complex, wider laces and I found those resolutions quite unsatisfying in relation to the more simple ones. But I also felt that with the more simple ones, maybe I had made the best ones I was able to make, so I sort of stopped making them for a while until I felt that I could force a different kind of resolution. I don’t like to just crank things out as a template for making work.

Your pins often feature letters, small patterns of incredibly thin paint, or feel mottled. What inspires the painting on each pin?

All sorts of things that are quite arbitrary, and I’m not sure I can logically talk about that at this time. I mean, I have a general sense that I’m interested in widening the vocabulary of them, which feels like a natural inclination in most art making, so I’m always looking for different kinds of colour ideas in things. The ways of articulating the surface for me, it’s just a different way of articulating the fact that the thing is a volume or a ball that sits on the wall, rather than a flat thing like a dot. So to give it that feeling of a solid or a volume, and obviously with the different colours, it’s about making dynamic relationships between the balls, so that each one is an individual thing within a whole, so that it’s not just an even field of yellow or an even field of red. And those different intensities of colour and patterning, to my mind, they can then influence how you can arrange the things on the wall. So I said that there are no rules, but there are these subtle things that are like different musical notes; they have different intensities and go better with some notes than others.

So would you say that your work is at once painting, sculpture and installation? 

Yeah, it’s a little bit of all of that. But I think it primarily derives from an early 20th Century painting tradition, and from Constructivism through American Minimalism.

And is it difficult to think in such a range of spatial and material issues?

I’m sure it is, but I take it so slowly that I don’t notice it too much. I work very slowly, so nothing presents itself as too hard or obstructive.

Can you describe to me in your own opinion the overall aesthetic and overall concepts of your work?

Oh, that’s a tough one. I don’t know if there are any totalizing concepts. As we’ve discussed, there are different strains in the practice and each of those play out different interests, but I think it’s self-generating, so concerns maybe come after something is born in the studio which makes it hard for me to think in terms of totalizing concepts. And also I find that way of thinking obstructs new things from occurring. I feel like it’s important to think of concepts from work to work and from strain to strain. In terms of aesthetics, people do talk about them in certain ways but I’m not sure that I want to talk about it myself.

Sunday, September 15

the emperor's new art


I'm excited about my new feature out! It's a very generalised discussion and kinda goes in circles but it's my own version of art activism (i.e. stopping apathy towards contemporary art). If you read it and are interested in this kinda thing, totally feel free to message or talk to me!

Click here to read my feature called 'The Emperor's New Art'.

xx
Lou

Saturday, September 14

songs in my head and on my mind [2]


My lovely friend Charlotte reminded me the other day that I must listen to Volcano Choir (a band consisting of several excellent musicians including Justin Vernon). I wasn't disappointed.


Often I use my Last.fm account to see what my friends are listening to and to inspire new listening journeys. Through this method I stumbled across Warpaint - a haunting, hypnotic band - which has completely intrigued me.



My friend, Adrian Ng, has recently released two singles on Bandcamp under the name 'Mavis Gary'. I am thrilled by the music he has created (everything you hear is done by him) and I can't wait for more.

xx
Lou

frank and iggy are your oysters



Last night I got an email from Zac Bayly who is the current editor at Australia's oldest independent fashion title Oyster Magazine and also in the VBN which I'm a part of. Oyster is about to release Oyster #103: The Hang Out In Real Life Issue and Zac is pretty excited about the new double covers featuring Frank Ocean and Iggy Azalea shot by Nabil. The photos are lovely (as are their subjects) and it's always surreal getting a personal email from someone you admire tremendously (working at or for Oyster would be a dream for me). 

For links to the covers on the Oyster website, click here.

For a teaser of the new issue, click here.

xx

Lou 

Tuesday, September 10

gus fisher exhibition: a different view - artists address pornography

[The UK Banned These American Apparel Ads And Wants Them Removed From The Internet]

Below is Sandy's (my mother) contribution to a panel discussion on art, advertising and pornography. Although it is in the format of a speech/oral discussion it still makes for an interesting read!


Gus Fisher Exhibition: A Different View. Artists Address Pornography

www.sexualpoliticsnow.org.nz

Panel Discussion Topic: 7

How might the increasing pervasiveness of pornographic representation of women's  bodies and sexuality be impacting the advertising genre? Today’s panelists have worked extensively in the advertising industry and they reflect on the representation of gender and sexuality and how the visual and representational conventions of pornography might be seguing into advertising.

Timing is everything. This week the Auckland University Law Revue Girls produced a video parodying Blurred Lines by Robin Thicke. It was taken off YouTube; they were interviewed on Campbell Live, and now they have produced a Snap chat extension.

We have had Miley Cyrus twerking and the ensuing social media storm. Needless to say she is very pleased with the outcome. There are twerking take offs are all over Instagram, and we are learning that this has an African American history.

This summer in America the New Yorker notes ‘we’ve achieved an historic break-through: the first completely digital big-time sex scandal – the sorry saga of Anthony Weiner alias Carlos Danger – running for Mayor of NY sexting AGAIN.

When you think about the broadening range of sex-related activities deemed immoral, unnatural, or icky, the greater the scope for righteous indignation; a technology enabled inter-connected globalised world; the media’s insatiable appetite for titillating stories that we can all be shocked at; the blurring of the lines between private and public, and our fascination with celebrity culture, none of this is surprising.

For me the world of advertising and the world of pornography and their gender tropes have become somewhat conflated. They represent market economies, based on consumption models. They both operate in the theatre of spectacle and performance. The word is morphing too. Did we always talk about food porn? Or disaster porn?  So I see pornography increasingly as a strand within the genre of advertising. But I should also add that I wouldn’t have said this ten years ago. Things change. But some things don’t change.

When Linda asked me to be on this panel I happened to be reading a book called Other Objects of Desire: Collectors and Collecting Queerly. It is a collection of essays with a historical take on the history of collecting around erotic/pornographic themes, starting with the Greeks, going the right way through to Robert Mapplethorpe and today’s erotic/porn internet addicts. Apart from the obvious – that the desire around, and interest in, depicting peoples’ sexual bits is ancient I did find it especially fascinating to learn more about what happened at another historic technologically disruptive moment. The introduction of the printing press did more than widen the scope of people who could access Bibles – it really played into the hands of collectors, widening the audience for this this type of material.  It is a top down history from the personal library of a king or queen to the online catalogue of potentially anyone, anywhere.

It is a long way from marble bits and bobs to pixelated bits and bobs. But is it?

Advertising, the depiction of women and pornography in my mind, all play off constructed cultural myths, ideas and images.

But I wanted to get away from what I think. People like me with backgrounds in strategy always ask the consumer. I was particularly interested in the consumer who blogs, snapchats, is on Instagram, Tumblr etc. So that is where I started. I talked to a handful of twenty something university students, across gender – variously describing themselves as third wave feminists; bloggers, the person who writes the sex column for one of the university magazines, and some self-declared purveyors of porn. My question to them was given the topic today what material would they show the audience to stimulate discussion.

1. A band called IS Tropical. Their track. “Dancing Anymore”. 

Single from album debuting 20 May 2013. Banned from YouTube just 25 minutes after aired. Million plus viewers on Vimeo. What did they think? They saw it as an ironic piss take on porn tropes. See what you think.

2. The unholy alliances

Next up an American Apparel print advertisement which appeared in Vice magazine. This ad was banned in 2010 in the UK and described as widely offensive as the model was thought to look like a child.

Then we have Sasha Grey in all her glory in another American Apparel. Sasha Grey is a celeb porn queen who is morphing into the world of business. Think Victoria Beckham and Spice Girls. Canny business women American Apparel is known for its sexually explicit advertising. Women, men, porn stars, and the company is now on the outlook for Tran sexy models. It is praised in some quarters for its honesty and lack of airbrushing. Oh and it is a big US vertically integrated manufacturer which has kept jobs in America and it’s supportive of immigration reform. So where is the line for us?

We live in a world where porn princes and princesses are, as far as we know, in on the game. They are celebrities with fan followers – brands if you like, playing the branding game for all its worth. All swimming in that current called advertising.

Finally the young adults I spoke too mentioned the porn boy next door - James Deen, who in July of this year released the first Google Glass x rated video. Isn’t this interesting, we have Google Glass as the must have accessory for porn stars and has anyone looked at the US September issue of Vogue? A 12 page spread with Google Glasses as the latest fashion accessory aptly called THE FINAL FRONTIER.

So what’s my position?

We live in a world where a grey t shirt is not necessarily just a grey t shirt. Nor is what might seem like a porn shot necessarily just a porn shot.

We think of gender and sexuality as things we see in images rather than inherent in the very structure of relations through which images have been inherited, bought, sold, exchanged and enjoyed.

Advertising and porn operate in part, in the public world of theatre, of spectacle. But what makes me feel that something is truly creepy isn’t just the visual on display, nor the standard tropes. It is the knowledge that the persons involved might have been coerced, or underage, or that the grey t shirt was made in terrible conditions in Bangladesh. I can’t always tell by looking. I also think that this masks an equally important conversation around the ethics of consumption in a resource constrained world.

But now because twenty something’s plus can so easily generate their own content it is also easier to sabotage, express outrage, go viral on these issues. I think this is what makes this so interesting.

And one final thing all consumptive models are ultimately terribly unsatisfying.